Tuesday, 23 June 2015

Are you proficient or fluent?

At what point do you “know” a language?
It’s a loaded question, but maybe a necessary one. 
Language Proficiency
We simply have a hard time figuring out when someone can claim a foreign language as one they speak. Linguists and language educators have known about this problem for years, which is why they have come up with the idea of language proficiency.
The term “proficiency” implies that we’re dealing with skills, because language ability is just that–a skill. In many ways, it’s like dancing, playing the guitar, riding a bike, or driving a car.
When it comes to skills, there’s a spectrum of abilities. 
Different language organizations around the world have developed scales to help identify a person’s foreign language ability. The scales might vary in the details, but they all basically want to identify whether a person is a beginner in the language, an expert, or somewhere in between.

In the US, an influential proficiency measure is the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR) scale, developed by the US State Department. It identifies five levels of language proficiency:

Additionally, a person in between levels might be at a 1+, 2+, 3+, or 4+ level.
  • Level 1 – Elementary – Can fulfill the basic needs in a language, such as ordering meals, asking time, and asking for directions.
  • Level 2 – Limited Working Proficiency – Can fulfill routine social demands, such as small talk about one’s self, one’s family, and current events.
  • Level 3 – Professional Working Proficiency – Can discuss a variety of topics with ease and almost completely understand what others are saying.
  • Level 4 – Full Professional Proficiency – Can participate in all manners of conversations with ease and only rarely makes grammatical mistakes.
  • Level 5 – Native or Bilingual Proficiency – Can use the language the way an educated native speaker of the language would.
European countries use something called the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. It’s the same idea, but the levels are broken down as:
  • A1 – Breakthrough or Beginner
  • A2 – Waystage or Elementary
  • B1 – Threshold or Intermediate
  • B2 – Vantage or Upper Intermediate
  • C1 – Effective Operational Proficiency or Advanced
  • C2 – Mastery or Proficiency
 A few things to notice.

First, proficiency levels are about what you can do in the language, not what you can’t. This is a minor, but important, distinction.

Second, C2 is the equivalent of Level 4. Those are considered “mastery” of a foreign language, and frankly, it is very rare to see someone achieve that level. But even at both those levels, you’re still expected to make a few grammatical or pronunciation mistakes. 

Third, the ILR breaks down levels further into different skills: reading, listening, speaking, and writing. You can be a Level 3 in reading and listening and a Level 2 in speaking .The European scale scores you by your weakest skill level, so if you’re a B1 in speaking and a C1 in reading, then your global language skills are rated as B1. I see merits to both approaches.

Fourth, it becomes increasingly difficult to go from one level to the next. It is somewhat straightforward  to learn enough language to order a meal at a restaurant and ask for directions. It is exponentially more difficult to be able to make small talk about anything. 

The inverse pyramid of language proficiency.
The pyramid illustrates that the amount of knowledge you need to go from one level to the next grows as you go along.

What about fluency?
So what does it mean to be fluent in a language?
“Fluent” is an imprecise term. I’ve heard people claim that you don’t reach fluency until you’re an absolute expert. The IIR scale even uses the terms “fluent” to describe levels 4 and 5–i.e., absolute mastery.
I think we can probably drop that down a notch, though. In my professional opinion, you are fluent at Level 3 (or C1). And I’d even go so far as to say that someone at Level 2+ (B2) could claim fluency.
Here’s why. Think about what the word “fluent” implies: You are able to participate in a conversation without struggling. You understand what the other person is saying, and you’re able to formulate an appropriate, understandable response back.

Does this matter?

Why are we even talking about this? Well, for me, I find the concept of levels encouraging.
Because the fact is, when you’re dealing with native speakers and actually trying to communicate in their language, they’re not always going to be patient and understanding. So it’s very easy to become discouraged.
When we’re out in the world speaking, we tend to think of our foreign language skills as pass/fail. But the levels let us know more precisely where our skill level is at.
we can take pride in what we’ve accomplished while still acknowledging how far we have yet to go!!
Happy Learning!




Reference: http://www.languagesurfer.com/

Monday, 22 June 2015

English words from India


Anaconda - Sinhalese henakandayā perhaps ← Dravidian
Arhat - Sanskrit arhat ‘deserving’
Ashram - Sanskrit asrama ‘hermitage’
Atman - Sanskrit atmān ‘essence’
Ayurvedic - Sanskrit ayur-veda ‘science of life or medicine’
Baboo - Hindi bābū ‘father’
Bahasa (as in Bahasa Indonesia) - Malay ← Sanskrit bhasa ‘language’
Bandanna - Portuguese ← Hindi bāndhnū ‘tie-dyeing’
Bangle - Hindi baŋgrī ‘glass bracelet’
Basmati - Hindi basmati ‘fragrant’
Begum - Urdu begam ← Eastern Turkish bigim ‘princess’
Beryl - Greek ← Dravidian Vēlūr, a toponym
Betel - Portuguese ← Malayalam veṭṭila
Bhang - Urdu bhang ← Sanskrit bhanga ‘hemp’
Birka - Hindi burqa ← Arabic
Biryani - Hindi ← Persian biryan ‘fried, roasted’
Blighty- Hindi bilāyatī ‘foreign’ ← Arabic wilāyat ‘district’ ← wilaya ‘rule’
Bonze - Japanese bonsō ← Mandarin fánsēng ‘Buddhist monk’; fán ← Sanskrit brāhman.as ‘Brahmin’
Bo (tree) - Sinhalese bo ← Sanskrit bodhi- ‘perfect knowledge’
Bodhisattva - Sanskit bodhi ‘perfect knowledge’ + sattvā ‘being’
Bosh (fiddle) - Romani bosh- ‘crow, fiddle’ ← Sanskrit vas- ‘bellow’
Brahmin - Sanskrit brāhman.as ← brahman ‘praise, worship’
Buddha - Sanskrit buddha ‘enlightened’ ← budh ‘awake, perceive’
Bund - Hindi band ← Persian
Bungalow - Gujarati bangalo ← Hindi banglā ‘Bengali’’
Bandy - short for ‘sugar candy’ ← ‘sugar’ + Arabic qandi ‘candied’ ← qand ‘cane sugar’ ← Dravidian, cf. Tamil kan.ṭu
Carambola - Marathi karanbal
Cash (type of coin) - Tamil kācu ← Sanskrit karša, a measure of weight
Catamaran - Tamil katta-maram ‘tied wood’
Chakra - Sanskrit chakra (cognate to ‘wheel’!)
cheetah - Hindi cītā ← Sanskrit citrakāya ‘speckled-body’
cheroot - French ← Tamil shurutti ‘roll’
China - Sanskrit Chīna ← (probably) Mandarin Qín dynasty
China (ware) - Persian chīnī— the first (17th century) citations in English are apt to be spelled Chiney, cheney— ← Sanskrit Chīna (q.v.)
Chintz - Hindi chīn.t ← Sanskrit citra ‘many-colored’
Chit - Hindi chiṭṭha ‘pass’ ← Sanksrit citra ‘many-colored’
Chop - Hindi chhāp ‘imprint’
Chukker - Hindi chakkar ‘circle’ ← Sanskrit chakra
Chutney - Hindi chaṭni
Congee - Tamil kañji
Coolie - Hindi kulī (perhaps the name of a tribe)
Copra - Malayalam koppara ← Hindi khopprā ‘coconut’
Corundum - Tamil kurundam ← Sanskrit kuruvinda ‘ruby’
Cosh - Romani kosh ‘stick, skewer’
Cot - Hindi khat ‘couch, hammock’
Cowrie - Hindi kauri ← Sanskrit kaparda
Cummerbund - Urdu kamar-band ‘loin-band’
Curry - Tamil kari ‘relish for rice’
Cushy - Hindi khush ‘pleasant’ ← Persian
Dacoit - Hindi dakait, from daka ‘gang robbery’ ← Sanskrit dashtaka ‘crowded’
Dal - Hindi dal ‘split pulse’
Dharma - Sanksrit dharma ‘decree, custom’
Dhoti - Hindi dhōti
Dinghy - Hindi ḍīn.gī ‘small boat’
Dungaree - Hindi dungrī, a toponym
Eka- (chemical prefix) - Sanksrit eka ‘one’
Gadjo - Romani
Ganja - Hindi ganjha
Ghat - Hindi ghāt ‘quay’
Ghee - Hindi ghī ← Sanskrit ghr.ta ‘sprinkling’
Ginger - Sanskrit śr.ñ-gaveram ‘horn-body’
Godown - Malay gadong ←Telugu gidangi ‘place where goods lie’
Gondwanaland - Sanskrit gondavana, name of a forest
Guar (gum) - Hindi guar
Gunny (sack) ← Hindi gōnī ← Sanskrit gon.ī
Guru - Hindi gurū ‘venerable one’ ← Sanskrit guruh ‘heavy, venerable’
Gymkhana - Hindi gend-khana ‘ball-house’
Hare Krishna - Hindi hare ‘oh God!’ + ‘Krishna’
Harijan - Sanksrit harijana = Hari ‘Vishnu’ + -jana ‘person’
Hatha yoga - Sanksrit hatha ‘force, violence’ + yoga
Himalayas - Sanskrit hima ‘snow’ + alaya ‘dwelling
Hindi - Hindi Hindī ‘Indian’ ← Persian hind; cf. India
Hindu - Hindi Hindū ‘an Indian’ ← Persian hind; cf. India
Hookah - Urdu ← Arabic huqqah ‘vase, bottle’
Howdah - Urdu haudah ← Arabic haudaj
India - Greek Indía ← Old Persian hiñd’u ← Sanskrit sindhu ‘(Indus) river’
Indigo - Portuguese ← Greek indikón ‘of India’, cf. India
Juggernaut - Hindi Jagannath ← Sanskrit Jagannatha ‘lord of the world’
Jungle - Hindi jāngal ‘wasteland’ ← Sanskrit jāngala ‘desert’
Jute - Bengali jhōṭo ← Sanskrit jūṭa
Kama Sutra - Sanksrit kama ‘love’ + sutra
Khalsa - Urdu khaliçah ← Arabic khaliç ‘pure, real’
Kshatriya - Sanksrit kshatriya ← kshatra ‘rule, authority’
Lacquer - Hindi lākh ‘resin’
Lakh - Hindi lakh
Lama - Tibetan blama
Lascar - Portuguese ← Urdu lashkar ‘army
Lingam - Sanskrit liŋga ‘distinctive mark, penis’
Loot - Hindi lūṭ ← Sanskrit loptra ‘booty’
Maharajah - Hindi maharaja ‘great king’; maha is cognate to Greek mega-
Mahatma - Sanksrit mahatman ‘great-souled’
Mahout - Hindi mahaut
Mandarin - Hindi mantrī ‘counsellor’
Mango - Portuguese ← Malay maŋga ← Tamil mānkāy ‘mango fruit’
Mantra - Sanskrit mantra ‘prayer’
Maya - Sanskrit māyā
Mongoose - Marathi mangūs ← Telugu mangisu
Mullah - Urdu mulla ← Arabic mawla
Musk - Latin ← Greek ← Sanskrit muşka ‘scrotum’
Nabob - French ←Urdu nawwab ‘deputy governor’
Namaste - Hindi ← Sanskrit námas ‘bowing’ + te dative of ‘you’
Nan - Hindi nān
Narc - Romani nak ‘nose’
Nard - Latin ← Greek ← Sanskrit nalada
Orange - French ← Spanish ← Arabic naranj ← Sanskrit naranga
Pagoda - Portuguese ← Dravidian ← Sanskrit bhagavati ‘holy’
Pajamas - Urdu payjamah ← Persian pay ‘foot’ + jamah ‘garment’
Pal - Romani ← Sanskrit bhrātar- ‘brother’
Palanquin - Portuguese ← Javanese pēlangki ← Sanskrit palyanka ‘bed’
Pariah - Tamil paraiyar, a caste ← parai ‘drum’
Patchouli - Tamil paccilai ‘green leaf’
Pepper - Latin ← Sanskrit pippalī ‘berry’
Polo - Balti polo
Prakrit - Sanskrit prakrta ‘natural, vulgar’
Punch - perhaps from Hindi panch ‘five’; OED finds it unlikely
Pundit - Hindi panḍit ← Sanskrit panḍita ‘learned’ ← Telugu pan.ḍa ‘wisdom’
Purdah - Urdu pardah ‘veil, curtain’
Puttee - Hindi patti ‘band(age)’ ← Sanskrit patta ‘bandage’
Raga - Sanskrit raga ‘color, passion, melody’
Raj - Hindi rāj ‘realm’
Rajah - Hindi rājā ‘king’ ← Sanskrit rājan (cognate to Latin rex)
Rakshasa - Sanskrit rakshasa ‘demon’ ← rakshas ‘to be guarded against’
Rupee - Hindi rupaīyā ← Sanskrit rūpya ‘wrought silver’
Sadhu - Sanskrit sadhū ‘holy man’
Sahib - Urdu ← Arabic çahib ‘friend’
Sandhi - Sanskrit samdhī ‘junction’
Samosa - Hindi samosā
Sandalwood - Latin ← Greek ← Sanskrit candanah.
Sanskrit - Sanskrit samskrta ‘perfected, well-formed’
Sari - Hindi sār.ī ← Sanskrit śāṭī ‘cloth’
Sarong - Malay sarung ← Sanksrit saranga ‘variegated’
Satyagraha - Sanskrit satya ‘truth’ + graha ‘pertinacity’
Sepoy - Urdu sipahi ‘horseman’ ← Persian sipah ‘army’
Shaman - Russian ← Tungusic ← Sanskrit śraman.ás ‘ascetic’
Shampoo - Hindi chāmpo ‘press, massage’
Shawl - French ← Urdu ← Persian shal
Sherpa - Tibetan sharpa ‘easterner’
Shri - Sanskrit srī ‘Lakshmi’
Shrub (drink) - Urdu ← Arabic shurb ‘beverage’ ← shariba ‘drink’
Sitar - Hindi sitār ‘three-stringed’
Soma (Vedic liquor) - Sanskrit soma
Stupa - Sanskrit stūpa ‘tuft of hair’
Sudra - Sanskrit śūdra
Sutra - Sanskrit sutra ‘thread, string’
Sugar - French ← Arabic ← Persian ← Sanskrit śarkarā ‘gravel, sugar’
Suttee - Sanskrit satī ‘virtuous woman’
Swami - Hindi svāmī ‘master’ ← Sanskrit svāmin
Swastika - Sanksrit svastika ← Sanskrit svasti ‘well-being’
Tandoor - Urdu tandur ← Turkish tandir ← Arabic tannūr ‘oven’
Tank - possibly Gujarati tānkh 'water reservoir'
Tantra - Sanskrit tantra ‘loom, system, doctrine’
Teak - Malayalam tekka
Thug - Hindi ṭhag ← Sanskrit sthaga ‘robber’
Tikka - Hindi tikka
Toddy - Hindi tār.ī ‘palm sap’ ← Sanskrit tāla ← Dravidian
Tom-tom - Hindi ṭamṭam (imitative)
Upanishad - Sanskrit upa ‘near’ + nishad ‘lie down’
Veda - Sanskrit veda ‘knowledge’ (cognate to ‘wit’)
Veranda - Hindi varanda ← Portuguese
Vindaloo - Hindi ← Portuguese vin d'alho ‘wine with garlic’
Wallah - Hindi -wala, a nominalizer
Yak - Tibetan γyag
Yeti - Tibetan yeh-teh ‘little manlike animal’
Yoga - Hindi ← Sanskrit yoga ‘union’
Yogi - Hindi yogī ← Sanskrit yogin
Yoni - Sanskrit yōni ‘abode, womb’
Zen - Japanese ← Mandarin chán(nà) ‘meditation’ ← Sanskrit dhyāna



Resource - zompist.
Feel free to add if you know more!!

Saturday, 30 May 2015

Adjectives that describe the art and way of talking

Let's talk...

There might had been times when we needed ages to let out our thoughts and talk, other times, we just hit it off and spoke our lungs out.

There are many adjectives that describe the art and way of talking. 



On and on till you succumb to death!!!

These clans of people have the gift of the gab. They will phrase, rephrase and rephrase their thoughts; garnish it with unnecessary words, and you'll resort to finding ear plugs to do away with the repetitiousness they employ. You'll feel their words piercing through your flesh, compelling you to think of escaping from the scene or quitting life. Adjective to define such brave hearts is VERBOSE.


Noisy and fiery:

This clan of people are noisy,clamorous,vehement. The paucity of content is replaced by loudness and force. They are VOCIFEROUS.


No sense at all: Read the following...

Angela took out the sword from the scabbard; swiveled her head and  winked at Simon. Poly took pleasure in drinking wine while their horse Pony absconded from the stable. Little did Aunt Samantha knew about the impending auction, she didn't cook any food...


Much talk, no sense.
Adjective-GARRULOUS.


Words refuse to come out:

There are times when we are stricken with- grief,rage,fear for example-we find it extremely difficult to convey our thoughts,or utter anything. Even if we foray into speaking, words fail us, we falter and formulate incomprehensible sentences. Here the adjective that best describes our predicament is-INARTICULATE.







Thursday, 28 May 2015

Comparative and superlatives patterns



§  The comparative and than

§  The superlative

§  As.....as

§  Than me/than I am

»»»»» The comparative and than:

We often use a phrase with than after a comparitive.

This hall is nicer than the Town Hall.
I have a bigger house than you.
The steak is more expensive than the fish.

»»»» The superlative:

We usually use the before a superlative.
We will adopt the quickest method.
This is the most difficult problem.

Note the pattern with "one of ".

Dorris is one of the most famous dentists ever.

After a superlative we can use in or of. We use in with places and with groups of people, e.g. team.

It's the most expensive hotel in New Jesrsey.
Who is the best participant in the game?
This question is the most difficult of all.
We often use a clause after a superlative.
That was the most interesting story that I've ever heard.
Sarah is the nicest person you could meet.


»»»» As.......as

We use as.....as to say that things are equal or unequal.

Our car is as spacious as yours.
It's warmer today. It isn't as cold as yesterday.

In a negative sentence we can also use so...as, but this is less common than as....as.

This yacht isn't as big as/so big as our old one.
The result of the match was the same as last year.
We can't drive as swiftly as you do.

»»»» Than me/ than I am:

Both are correct, and have the same meaning:

You're ten years younger than me.
You're ten years younger than I am.

Peter isn't as tall as him.
Peter isn't as tall as he is.


After than or as, a personal pronoun on its own has the object form, e.g. me.
However, if the pronoun has a verb after it, then we use the subject form, e.g.I.



Monday, 25 May 2015

Key Points - climbing up in the ladder.

Key Points from Maxwell’s text about climbing up in the ladder.

In the past few weeks, I got excellent opportunity to go through lot of articles, books, audio tapes and videos related leadership topics. My whole September spent majority on Maxwell’s Leadership work.

There is a wonderful piece literature about leadership levels in “Developing Leader within You”. I thought it would be nice to provide my view about that here.
* Leadership is a journey & it does not end with an achievement of certain qualities.
* I view Maxwell’s five levels of leadership mainly within an organizational structure but it can be applied beyond that.
* There are 5Ps of leadership in the increasing order respectively – Position, Permission, Production, People Development, Personhood.

* Maxwell nicely states all the indicators starting with letter “R” so there will be 5Rs corresponding to each “P” level  Rights, Relationships, Results, Reproduction, Respect.

* One of the “Maxwell-ism” says “Leadership is Influence. That’s it. Nothing more; nothing less.” & all these five levels are carefully built on this Influence factor.

I encourage all of you to go through “Developing The Leader within You” to fulfill your leadership career.

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

Pecuniary



We know that "Pecuniary" pertains to money, as in, pecuniary affairs; let's discuss its derivation.


"Pecuniary" is derived from the Latin root "pecus" means cattle. In early days one's affluent background was not measured by stocks or shares but by the stock of cattle one possessed, which was considered to be logical as one could procure milk, meat and leather.




A person who had lots of "pecus", in the past, was affluent, a person who was without "pecus" was broke and destitute. In today's world who is without any money or funds habitually, who lacks money power is called an impervious person.

Tuesday, 28 April 2015

Comparative and Superlative forms-Short and long adjectives

Today we will talk about Comparative and Superlative forms-Short and long adjectives. 

»»»We form the Comparative and Superlative of short adjectives and long adjectives (cheap...expensive) in different ways.




Ex: cheap cheaper cheapest
       expensive more expensive most
       expensive.

»»»One-syllable adjectives(ex-small,nice) usually have the er,est ending.

§  Your car is smaller.
§  Eliza needs a bigger house now.
§  This is the nicest restaurant.
§  This zone is the warmest.


»»However, we use more, most with three-syllable adjectives (eg: ex-cit-ing) with longer ones.

§  The film was more exciting than the play.
§  The attire is more elegant.
§  We indulged in the most interesting project.
§  He is the most reliable of them all.

»»»Some two-syllable adjectives have we, est, and some have more, most.

Two-syllable adjectives:

»»»Words ending in consonant + y have er,est, e.g. happy, happier, happiest.
Like-busy, dirty, easy, tidy, silly, pretty, lucky, lovely, heavy, funny, easy.

»»»Some words have er, est or more, most, e.g, narrow, narrower, narrowest or more narrow, most narrow.

Like-clever, tired, stupid, simple, quiet, polite, pleasant, gentle, cruel, common.

»»»The below-mentioned words have more, most, e.g. useful, more useful, most useful.

§  Words ending in full or less, e.g. careful,helpful, useful, hopeless.
§  Words ending in ing or ed, e.g. surprised, annoyed, willing, boring.
§  Many others, e.g. afraid, recent, normal, nervous, modern, frequent, foolish, famous, exact, eager, correct, certain, afraid.